Shortly before the end of life on credit or where to get, if not steal Last Sunday evening there was to see a strange scene: The West German sensitivities Crime dealt with the collapse of our credit system. Or more precise: What happens to the Man, if life back on credit-inflated?
What would an interesting question may be going in the crime scene at literally: as hedges three, which a perfidious profit system, the credit for the nice terraced house with the inventory and a mobile pedestal in the ass sold off from a really waterproof coup - and end as a joke, the do not realize that they eat a miserable beggar and not to have. German federal and bravely accept their fate and have to work off their lot. This one does, if one is decent. And the only one open eye detects what may in fact that Bonnie is an incorrigible "pocket-revolutionaries" who lives in a caravan and feeding his "sparking" tumor in the head with porn and Karl Marx. Actually yes I am
a fan of the "crime scene". But since Sunday I think about it much, if not regularly watching television dismounted 1 3 / 4 hours are completely thrown out the window investment. As the checked already for some time reading the newspaper about ...
fact, I did not think that the makers of this series would be so shameless to side with those who want us all to give understanding now: Now the belts are tightening, you have lived for decades about your situation is now necessary the consequences of hardness be implemented. The sorry, but it is unfortunately inevitable. And because Spähne fall, is planed out - the whole thing will probably be got off without sacrifice. Well, neoliberal Law 7: Shit happens!
What is certainly a completely correct analysis. If one expands the framework crucial. But nothing else than the old "We splurge, you pay the bill" if you think like the Tatortisten.
For how surprised no one really know that it seems perfectly fine, if uncertain credit collapse, people lose their jobs and their homes and in debt up to her death benefit may express milk into a system that gives them but all the brought wonderful blessings of the modern lifestyle has until close!
On the other hand, billions are made loose (where did it?) In order to stabilize an ailing banking system, which then immediately those paid from the taxes of the next 20 generations - of course, interest-free - will forward loan as a million commission to his irresponsible leaders who are the misery have even brewed the first place?
Why is the beautiful patriarchal basic rule that if a for your actions and suffer the consequences like a man "really only for those who always look forward even as a donkey before the cart? And ad hoc "After me the deluge" when it comes to those who sitting on the box? Is it perhaps from the membership of a Christian party - or at a church, which have indeed think differently-not-seen excommunicated but takes pedophile priest under the mantle of silence? Must be either a fundamentalist Christianist or hedge fund managers to escape the collapse because he may be blessed at a subsidized premortal paradise?
Maybe it's not so bad to look at the crime scene, for what one can really learn is that the rules only apply for one - and never for all. Believe it or - in this case - money and position have always been useful when it came to Free access leeway to make.
few weeks ago I had written the biography of Ditfurth Ulrike Meinhof read - which interestingly is also present in the scene, as a "Mr. Baader-Meinhof" (!). Yes, the German quagmire that is it is called "Zeitgeist" is truly about the "terror-trauma" not yet come across, if more than 30 years after her death to determine the sex is not even clear to this woman. It would be from its history to understand something about this, our country. The precise procedure, for example, to those who dare to put the finger on the problem: law applies only to those who are in the right.
Ulrike Meinhof was one that with this "fact" that we live in a system in which many pay for the excessive gratification of a few with their lives, did not agree. As the mad house owner with the "egg" in the head in the scene, she understands that even a lifelong hard labor to pay off a never-ending credit - the so the only reason why is so high because we pay money to get money - Slavery . Because we are not free to choose to "against". The penalty for the exclusion. Just the way he is, if we do not keep us honest in the repayment agreements. Because we lose our job. Because the Bank to the company that pays our Job, the loans announced ... We
the three heads of families who attacked a bank in the crime scene to get the money to pay to obtain the bank ... - Ulrike Meinhof also tried to reverse the structural system of this tight spot, to escape him. And in order to set examples that should make it possible for many to realize what they serve Mammon as in reality.
has
But as these three admittedly not very original debtor made Ulrike Meinhof reckoned without the internal host, we ourselves are the ones who prepare the system for life nourished by our fears and expectations of the growth base.
only for this reason it was and is possible, people who more than thirty have years four banks robbed and killed a man (and this at a time when already an incredible propaganda and persecution had fallen on it) make it to this day the nightmare that keeps a nation at bay: as "terrorists" nothing else in mind than have to compromise our good home stability. And that means, of course, bomb violence. Because we need the enemy to have a reason not to go to the door and look down on us at the dilapidated house where we all sit like Plato's dogs on television and believe that 3D animation is the reality. And the ruins of a palace for the whole drudgery worthwhile.
The "bomb" the crime scene was a Attrape. The police force has launched a hysterical on the plan. The bombs under our butt, leaving the machinations of the Americans and the garbage dumps of 40 nuclear power are the exact opposite: you can fly us but only piecemeal and almost imperceptibly, but still in one million years around the ears. We are dying slowly but surely. Just call the (unfortunately) nothing to write home more behind the stove. Let alone a special unit. On the contrary, if one is so stupid to ask or even demand an attitude they must be careful or he already enormous, not to be the same as "state enemy," placed under observation. And since then regardless of isses with Credibility and so on. (! Up on the children)
Franz Xaver Kroetz, the "crazy" and the despised of all the plays caravan owner, puts it in the crime scene once said: We are all dopey. So isses. As long as we obediently follow the rules and believe them to play, close your eyes when cheating, the inventors of the same or relocate to new requirements - as long as we are probably not otherwise deserve.
We are all Monopolyisten. Hopefully we go over and pull DM 2000 - even if the currency is no longer a long one. But still unnoticed fly more and more out of us - because we are neither houses, let alone can afford whole streets or train stations, for their use, we then ask for more rent brilliant roads, houses and stations to buy. The in turn may be used only by those who have the necessary cash. And if we are truly smart, let us subsidize the trains and stations, including wages for employees of those who may at the counter then pay again for transport. Because they are too stupid to notice that the train is actually theirs, would be the rule "I heard what I paid" actually apply once.
And why am I writing about it now except that I'm upset? What does that have to move, extract and change to do? Quite a lot, I mean.
Ulrike Meinhof, Gudrun Ensslin, Andreas Baader and all the others who thought they expose their selbstverachtende obvious consequence of this system clearly to all concerned (because that was their goal!) Could have taught us to recognize we can not see what we want. We want to play the Monopoly and get in those with feet that were screened out or better watch it. A competitor less about the treasure at the end of the rainbow.
We want to belong. We like to do everything right. We love rules because they make the world so neatly. And we long for punishment when a dares to challenge the rules in question.
And because this is so, what we want to monitor the compliance of the rules. A Chancellor. An enforcement official at the bank. A tax office employee. A judge. A prison guard. And one who decides if someone is really reached deep enough below to be in need. For € 324 a month may not be issued lightly. Where would we be there. Our children should learn
that you can not have everything one wants. While we consider whether we can afford the next consumer loans. We only treat anything.
I have lived too long Sun I was high debt, because I have a living room, a fast car, and generally wanted to have money. I wanted to join - and finally, do not do it all the way?
have some point I started to wonder. Why am I worked around the clock and all my money like water flowing out the door. Because I needed all the many things and people to earn the money that devoured all the many things and people ... Saved
me my child. Because was not feeling to work 16 hours a day, 7 days a week (as self) suddenly. And since I was also very fast out there. Mothers with small children are not playing along anyway for the competitive intensive likely took my then main client and announced my existence securing contracts. Woman becomes vulnerable.
Somehow I managed to stop the rat race. The skid marks are still stopped a few years, because I still had "to pay" a lot. Today I am virtually debt free and the rest I give to the bank. Finally deserve so only because I owe them something. Only there for me to get anything. And a few months, I have even left the tax office.
What is now so "easy" so writes the result of a long struggle with my inner shackles that have bound me to this system. Belonging. Recognition. Appreciation. Being a good and true man. Independence. Security. And last but not least the feeling that I would be a form of "good life". Expectations and ideas. The program that we have enrolled all of us when we go to work in this country 13 years to school, 10 years to university and 40 years. We can read each day in the newspaper. And, with each scene once more worked up taut. Which would be happy because even as an outsider "in the gutter" - land - or in the trailer? In porn and Karl Marx?
I can imagine worse off society. For example, my "Home Bank". Or - in the acute case - of the orthodontist my daughter. Another such an idea - and again a money pit, in which I could dig into it's. So that my child looks like all. With straight teeth. Well, in Monopoly the only feature difference is indeed only the color. The males. Is not it?
